November 4, 2019, 11.30–16.00. The House of Literature, Wergelandsveien 29, 0167 Oslo.
A seminar hosted by Academia Europaea Bergen Hub assesses the findings of the SAPEA report ‘Making sense of science for policy’ and reflects on what insights might be applied to science advice in Norway
The Academia Europaea Bergen Hub has hosted a successful seminar in Oslo, in collaboration with the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters. The seminar, held on 4th November at the House of Literature, assessed the findings of the recent SAPEA report, Making sense of science for policy and reflected on what insights might be applied to the science advice process in Norway.
The seminar was designed around two linked sessions, one focused on the European dimension of evidence-informed policy and the second examining Norwegian policymaking.
Professor Eystein Jansen, Director of the Bergen Hub, welcomed everyone to the seminar and emphasised the timeliness of the topic under discussion. Professor Ole Petersen, Director of the Cardiff Hub (which coordinated the SAPEA report) gave an introduction to the European Science Advice Mechanism and the role played by academies within it.
Session 1: ‘Making sense of science for policy’ Evidence Review Report
Professor Jeroen van der Sluijs (Bergen), a member of the SAPEA Working Group, presented the key findings of the SAPEA report, with a thought-provoking response provided by Professor Silvio Funtowicz (Bergen) and a lively debate with the audience, with skilful moderation by Professor Matthias Kaiser (Bergen).
Please see the article published in Forskningspolitikk: https://www.fpol.no/gviken/
Themes that came up included:
- The issue of bias and the underrepresentation of certain social groups within science
- The role of the humanities in evidence-informed policymaking
- The potential for including different types of knowledge and extended peer communities in science advice
An interesting case study came from Finland, which is trialling a new approach to science advice, drawing on insights from the European Commission’s Science Advice Mechanism. Professor Risto Nieminen, President of the Finnish Academy, spoke of the contribution that could be made by academies to the design and operation of such a system.
Session 2: Science advice in Norway
The second half of the seminar put science advice in Norway under the spotlight. Professor Oystein Hov (Norwegian Academy) gave several examples of success and failure of science advice in Norway. Kyrre Lekve (Simula) spoke of two contrasting relationships experienced by science advisers, one with civil servants, the other with politicians.
The closing discussion between the panel and the audience, also moderated by Matthias Kaiser, gave rise to further reflections on science advice in Norway. They included:
- The nature of risk assessment, citing the example of mercury contamination from a sunken U-boat off the Norwegian coast. Please see the article published in Forskningspolitikk: https://www.fpol.no/kunnskapspolitikk-i-norge-og-en-ubat-utenfor-fedje/
- The contribution the European science advice model could make to solving policy problems in Norway. Please see the article published in Forskningspolitikk: https://www.fpol.no/a-gi-forskningen-mening-i-en-politisk-kontekst/
- The use and potential misuse of scientific knowledge in the context of policymaking
Look out for a full report on the seminar, to be published in the coming weeks.
- See videos from the presentations and discussions here
- Please see the MASOS evidence report and further information on the SAPEA website.
- See full program at UiB.no or Facebook event.