Recorded event: The search for habitable planets in other solar systems

The first planet in another solar system was discovered in 1995 and raised existential questions: Are we alone? Could humans thrive on other planets? How can we detect life or assess habitability? In this recorded lecture, Professor Carina Persson, professor of astrophysics and head of Chalmers Exoplanet Group, provides an overview of the field, describe the current frontiers, and paint an outlook of the discoveries to come with better observational capacity.

The recording was made during the Darwin Day & Horizons lecture with Professor Carina Persson at University of Bergen on Wednesday 12th of February 2025.

The first planet in another solar system was discovered in 1995 and immediately raised existential questions: Are we alone? Could humans thrive on other planets? How can we detect life or assess habitability?

The first exoplanet, a planet that orbits another star than our sun, was seen from Earth as late as 1995 by Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz and earned them a shared Nobel Prize in Physics. Before their breakthrough, it was believed that all planets and systems would look like our own. But the first planet was an unexpected new type.

In the decades that followed, enormous efforts have been made to detect and characterize exoplanets with both dedicated space missions and ground-based facilities. Now almost 6000 exoplanets have been found, and the two most common types of planets have no counterparts in our own solar system. Further, no exoplanet system with similar architecture to our own has so far been detected.

This has led to a dramatic change of our understanding of planets and planetary systems: there is an enormous diversity of exoplanets and system architectures.

It is, however, extremely difficult to observe exoplanets: most often they are seen as faint dips in a star’s brightness as the planet passes in front. The smaller the planet the harder it is to document, and very few of those have been well characterized. There is still an observational bias so that the full diversity of exoplanets has not yet been explored and explained.

Future space missions and development of state-of-the-art spectrographs mounted on ground-based facilities promise new discoveries. There is hope that these will reveal the true breadth and variability among exoplanets. A fundamental challenge is investigations of planet atmospheres, which are key to inferring habitability and the search for extraterrestrial life.

In this talk, professor Carina Persson will provide an overview of the field, describe the current frontiers, and paint an outlook of the discoveries to come with better observational capacity.

 

The search for habitable planets in other solar systems

Darwin Day & Horizons lecture:

The first planet in another solar system was discovered in 1995 and raised existential questions: Are we alone? Could humans thrive on other planets? How can we detect life or assess habitability? In this lecture, Professor Carina Persson, professor of astrophysics and head of Chalmers Exoplanet Group, will provide an overview of the field, describe the current frontiers, and paint an outlook of the discoveries to come with better observational capacity.

The lecture starts at 16.15, on Wednesday 12th of February 2025 in Egget at Studentsenteret. 

Outer space

The lecture (held in english): Life on other planets – The search for habitable planets in other solar systems

The first planet in another solar system was discovered in 1995 and immediately raised existential questions: Are we alone? Could humans thrive on other planets? How can we detect life or assess habitability?

The first exoplanet, a planet that orbits another star than our sun, was seen from Earth as late as 1995 by Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz and earned them a shared Nobel Prize in Physics. Before their breakthrough, it was believed that all planets and systems would look like our own. But the first planet was an unexpected new type.

In the decades that followed, enormous efforts have been made to detect and characterize exoplanets with both dedicated space missions and ground-based facilities. Now almost 6000 exoplanets have been found, and the two most common types of planets have no counterparts in our own solar system. Further, no exoplanet system with similar architecture to our own has so far been detected.

This has led to a dramatic change of our understanding of planets and planetary systems: there is an enormous diversity of exoplanets and system architectures.

It is, however, extremely difficult to observe exoplanets: most often they are seen as faint dips in a star’s brightness as the planet passes in front. The smaller the planet the harder it is to document, and very few of those have been well characterized. There is still an observational bias so that the full diversity of exoplanets has not yet been explored and explained.

Future space missions and development of state-of-the-art spectrographs mounted on ground-based facilities promise new discoveries. There is hope that these will reveal the true breadth and variability among exoplanets. A fundamental challenge is investigations of planet atmospheres, which are key to inferring habitability and the search for extraterrestrial life.

In this talk, professor Carina Persson will provide an overview of the field, describe the current frontiers, and paint an outlook of the discoveries to come with better observational capacity.

Is our planet unique? Or is the current lack of Earth-like planets only a matter of detection bias? Can this question be answered by future missions?

Everybody is welcome! Light refreshments will be served from 15.45. The lecture starts at 16.15, on Wednesday 12th of February 2025 in Egget at Studentsenteret. Find the event on Facebook. See poster from Darwin Day 2025 in Bergen.

Professor Carina Persson
Carina Persson is professor of astrophysics and head of Chalmers Exoplanet Group at Chalmers University of Technology in Gothenburg, Sweden. Her research is focused on discoveries of new exoplanets in transit photometry surveys by space telescopes (Kepler, TESS, CHEOPS, and the future PLATO mission), and characterization using follow-up observations from ground-based facilities.

Organisers
This lecture is a joint event organised by the Horizon Lecture Committee at the Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technology, the Darwin Day Committee at the Department of Biological Sciences, and Academia Europaea Bergen Hub. The lecture receives economic support from Selskapet til Vitenskapenes Fremme.

Recorded Event: The Future of Arctic Collaboration at a Crossroad

Warming nearly four times faster than the global average, the Arctic stands as both a warning and a roadmap for addressing the interconnected crises of climate change, biodiversity loss, and geopolitical tensions. Rather than just to reflect on these challenges, we try to chart a way forward for collaboration, innovation, and equitable governance in the Arctic, project director Ole Øvretveit  said in his introduction at the Arctic Frontiers event co-hosted by Academia Europaea Bergen.

The event was hosted under the UArctic-funded project, Rethinking Arctic Collaboration, led by a consortium of institutions, including Academia Europaea Bergen, the University of Bergen, the Alfred Wegener Institute, Nord University, and Dartmouth College, among others. The project’s mission is clear: to understand the current state of Arctic research and science diplomacy while facilitating new frameworks for sustainable, ethical, and impactful collaborations.

Historically, the Arctic has benefited from international cooperation frameworks, such as the Arctic Council, fostering collaboration in research and governance. However, recent geopolitical events, including Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine and growing global geopolitical tensions, have disrupted key activities in Arctic scientific diplomacy and collaboration. As we approach the Fifth International Polar Year (IPY5) in 2032–33, we urgently need to rethink and frame the future of polar science cooperation and diplomacy to address global challenges with the most effective, impactful, and equitable ethical research collaborations for our planet.

Find the recording here, and explore the discussion on issues like:

What might future challenges, stakes, and key strategic pathways toward future Arctic science diplomacy be?

How do we safeguard the integrity of knowledge production informing Arctic policy and diplomacy?

How do we embed equitable and ethical engagement in Arctic science diplomacy to increase its effectiveness in informing and shaping global policy?

Panelists are Volker Rachold, Head of the German Arctic Office, Miguel Roncero, International Relations Officer at the European Commission, Melody Brown Burkins, Director Institute of Arctic Studies at Dartmouth, Ole Øvretveit, Project Manager at Academia Europaea Bergen, Anders Oskal, Secretary General of the Association of World Reindeer Herders and Jenny Baseman, consultant.

 

Fremtidens utvikling av medisiner og materialer: KI og autonomi

Det finnes flere mulige molekyler enn stjerner i universet. Om ikke lenge vil nåla i høystakken, det nye legemiddelet eller materialet, bli oppdaget av KI-styrte beregninger og roboter. Kom og hør hva professor Vidar R. Jensen, som jobber med design og utvikling av katalysatorer, legemidler og andre funksjonelle molekyler, tenker om tematikken.

Portrett av foredragsholder

Foto/ill.:
Vidar Remi Jensen/Foto Eivind Senneset/UiB

Om møtet (holdes på norsk)
Vi lever i en tid der kunstig intelligens (KI) synes å revolusjonere alle deler av samfunnet. Store språkmodeller har bestått Turing-testen for intelligens, og begynner å bli daglige hjelpemidler for mange av oss.

På den vitenskapelige fronten kan Nobel-pris-verktøyet AlphaFold forutsi 3D-strukturen til proteiner med bortimot eksperimentell nøyaktighet, og vi hører også stadig at KI kan fremskynde utviklingen av legemidler. Likevel er det så langt få eksempler på KI-utviklede legemidler. Maskinlæringsmodellene krever rett og slett mer data enn tidkrevende kjemisk syntese og analyse kan levere. Men det finnes håp! Molekyler kan undersøkes, og data genereres, raskere gjennom beregninger enn eksperimenter. Samtidig er KI-styrte roboter i ferd med å innta laboratoriene, og de kan gjøre mange eksperimenter samtidig og til alle døgnets tider, uten å bli trøtte.

Datamengdene og KI-revolusjonen er altså på vei, også i kjemien. Men hvordan kan KI hjelpe til med utvikling av legemidler, og hvordan vil den fremtidige KI- og robotbaserte utviklingen av legemidler og materialer se ut? professor Vidar R. Jensen, ved Kjemisk institutt, UiB, som jobber med design og utvikling av katalysatorer, legemidler og andre funksjonelle molekyler, vil gi en gjennomgang av tematikken.

Til slutt blir det spørsmål fra salen og antatt en interessant og lærerik diskusjon.

Om foredragsholderen
Vidar R. Jensen er professor ved Kjemisk institutt, UiB. Hans hovedinteresse er design og utvikling av katalysatorer, legemidler og andre funksjonelle molekyler.

Praktisk informasjon

  • Dato 4. februar 2025
  • Møtet er åpent for alle, og starter 16.30 i Auditorium 2 i Realfagbygget (underetasjen), Allegaten 41.
  • Det blir lett servering utenfor auditoriet fra kl. 16.00.  
  • Arrangører: NTVATekna Bergen og Academia Europaea Bergen.

Season’s greetings from Hub Director Eystein Jansen

Dear Members of Academia Europaea in the Nordic and Baltic Regions,

As we approach the end of the year, I would like to share some reflections on our concerns and activities at the Bergen Hub.

This year has once again been profoundly affected by the ongoing war in Ukraine, which has reshaped the landscape for research and academic life across Europe. The aggression and its broader geopolitical implications have diminished security and limited opportunities for peaceful scientific collaboration and the open exchange of ideas and results. Our Hub’s activities have focused significantly on understanding these challenges.

We now find ourselves in a situation where research funding competes increasingly with military expenditures, raising concerns about the norms of openness in science. The potential for research outcomes to be misused for hostile purposes against our European democracies (the Dual Use dilemma) is a pressing issue.

The ongoing conflicts in the Middle East, marked by horrific atrocities against civilians, further complicate this landscape. Additionally, the return of the Trump administration in the USA creates uncertainties for rational, science-based governance in the world’s largest economy, which could have global repercussions for academia.

The current climate for research is undeniably precarious. Europe is lagging in research-based innovation compared to the USA and China, and the long-term outlook appears challenging. However, there are positive developments also. In my role as Vice-President of the ERC, overseeing Physical Sciences and Engineering, I have seen influential reports emerge as we approach the 10th EU Framework Programme for research. The Draghi report on the future of European competitiveness, the Letta report on the European internal market, and the Heitor report on the design of the 10th Framework Program all commend the ERC’s achievements in advancing world-class frontier science. These reports advocate for the extension of the ERC and the restructuring of the European research and innovation landscape, following the ERC’s model of excellence and independent governance. If these recommendations are implemented, they could foster the emergence of more leading research groups in Europe, strengthening our research and innovation base against global competition. This development aligns closely with the strategic goals of Academia Europaea.

In 2024, as in the previous year, our Hub’s activities have focused especially on the Arctic. We successfully hosted a well-attended side event at Arctic Frontiers 2024 conference, titled A New Arctic Energy Mix, featuring leading experts on energy and the green transition. And through our ongoing Rethinking Arctic Collaboration – project we have organised events at key European Arctic conferences, including the Arctic Circle in Berlin in May and at the Arctic Circle Assembly in Reykjavik in October, the latter featuring both a closed roundtable with key stakeholders and an open event; Rethinking Arctic – Scenarios on future Scientific cooperation and diplomacy . We have just finished a workshop at the Dartmouth College’s Institute of Arctic Studies, kicked-off with a public event; Climate Diplomacy on Thin Ice: Navigating Arctic Cooperation & Polar Governance. The outcomes of the workshop will be both a scientific paper and policy briefs on future perspectives of Arctic science cooperation and science diplomacy, pointing towards the upcoming International Polar Year in 2032.

We encourage our members to bring forward suggestions and initiatives for Hub activities, which this year led to our partnership with Professor Jens Braarvig (MAE) in co-organising the Second Biennial Conference of the World Philology Union at Uppsala University from December 4th to 6th, 2024. The central theme will be on historical languages. We look forward to welcoming further membership initiatives in the coming year.

The membership in our regions needs renewal, and I will use this opportunity to encourage all to be active in the ongoing nomination cycle.

I wish all our members a peaceful and relaxing holiday period, in the hope that next year we will see the world coming somewhat back to its senses.

 

Eystein

Recorded event: Climate Diplomacy on Thin Ice

Climate Diplomacy on Thin Ice: Navigating Arctic Cooperation & Polar Governance

A recording of the panel discussion at Dartmouth College, November 18th 2024,

The geopolitical landscape of the Arctic has shifted dramatically following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which paused over 25 years of traditional Arctic Council-informed and -guided cooperation with Arctic Indigenous Peoples, Arctic Nations, and Observer States. This break in Arctic diplomacy, particularly the cessation of scientific cooperation, raises crucial questions about the future of Arctic collaboration on challenges facing the Arctic and the planet. In light of this, our project seeks to present a series of informed scenarios that may help guide Arctic diplomacy and cooperation as we look toward 2032, a year that will also mark the 5th International Polar Year (IPY-5).

Panelists

Ole Øvretveit, Manager & Researcher of Arctic Science Diplomacy Project, University of Bergen & Academia Europaea Bergen, Norway

Volker Rachold, Head of the German Arctic Office, Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI), Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Germany

Heather Exner-Poirot, Director of Energy, Natural Resources and Environment at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute; Special Advisor to the Business Council of Canada; Research Advisor to the Indigenous Resource Network, Canada

Matthias Kaiser, Professor Emeritus at the Center for the Study of the Sciences and Humanities (SVT) at the University of Bergen; International Science Council Fellow, Norway

Jenny Baeseman, Arctic and polar consultant; former Executive Director of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR); former Director of the Climate and the Cryosphere Project (CliC), USA

Moderated by Melody Brown Burkins, Director, Institute of Arctic Studies, Dickey Center, Dartmouth

Climate Diplomacy on Thin Ice: Navigating Arctic Cooperation & Polar Governance

Our panelists will explore informed scenarios that may help guide Arctic diplomacy and cooperation in the coming decade.
November 18th 2024 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm

Please click here to register for the livestream.

The geopolitical landscape of the Arctic has shifted dramatically following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which paused over 25 years of traditional Arctic Council-informed and -guided cooperation with Arctic Indigenous Peoples, Arctic Nations, and Observer States. This break in Arctic diplomacy, particularly the cessation of scientific cooperation, raises crucial questions about the future of Arctic collaboration on challenges facing the Arctic and the planet. In light of this, our project seeks to present a series of informed scenarios that may help guide Arctic diplomacy and cooperation as we look toward 2032, a year that will also mark the 5th International Polar Year (IPY-5).

Panelists

Ole Øvretveit, Manager & Researcher of Arctic Science Diplomacy Project, University of Bergen & Academia Europaea Bergen, Norway

Volker Rachold, Head of the German Arctic Office, Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI), Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Germany

Heather Exner-Poirot, Director of Energy, Natural Resources and Environment at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute; Special Advisor to the Business Council of Canada; Research Advisor to the Indigenous Resource Network, Canada

Matthias Kaiser, Professor Emeritus at the Center for the Study of the Sciences and Humanities (SVT) at the University of Bergen; International Science Council Fellow, Norway

Jenny Baeseman, Arctic and polar consultant; former Executive Director of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR); former Director of the Climate and the Cryosphere Project (CliC), USA

Moderated by Melody Brown Burkins, Director, Institute of Arctic Studies, Dickey Center, Dartmouth

The event is free and open to the public. It will be recorded and livestreamed. Please click here to register for the livestream.

Er kunstig intelligens (KI) bærekraftig?

Kunstig intelligens (KI) er både en vitenskapelig disiplin, en ingeniørdisiplin, en forretningsmodell og et verktøy. Så hva betyr det å drive med “bærekraftig” KI? Kom og hør hva to ledende UiB-eksperter, Jill Walker Rettberg og Marija Slavkovik, tenker om tematikken.

KI generert illustrasjon av menneske-robot

Kunstig intelligens er både en vitenskapelig disiplin, en ingeniørdisiplin, en forretningsmodell og et verktøy. Så hva betyr det å drive med “bærekraftig” KI?

Det er lett å sette søkelys på bærekraften til ressursene som KI-støttet maskinvare bruker. På den ene siden lever vi i en tid hvor klimaendringer er et aktuelt problem som ikke tåler flere unnskyldninger. På den andre siden, når vi tenker på KI, ser vi for oss et kunstig skapt intelligent vesen laget i menneskets bilde. For eksempel, generativ AI mage.space reagerer på «promptet» kunstig intelligens med bilder av robothoder (ref bildet over).

Dette er en måte å forstille seg kunstig intelligens på. I virkeligheten er kunstig intelligens en globalt distribuert virksomhet som er avhengig av asiatisk hardware, europeiske forbrukerpenger, nordamerikansk teknologisk innovasjon, billig arbeidskraft fra det globale sør, og globalt distribuerte forskere og programvareutviklere. Hvor bærekraftig er så AI-virksomheten globalt i dette perspektivet?

Kom og hør hva to ledende UiB-eksperter, Jill Walker Rettberg og Marija Slavkovik, tenker om tematikken. Til slutt blir det spørsmål fra salen og antatt en interessant og lærerik diskusjon.

Det blir lett servering utenfor auditoriet fra kl. 16.00.  

Møtet er åpent for alle, og starter 16.30 i Auditorium 1 i Realfagbygget (underetasjen), Allegaten 41.

Dato: Tirsdag 19. november 2024

Arrangører: NTVATekna Bergen og Academia Europaea Bergen.

Recorded event: Rethinking Arctic – Scenarios on future Scientific cooperation and diplomacy

The future of Arctic collaboration is at a crossroads. As we look toward 2032 and beyond, it is essential to engage in forward-thinking discussions that go beyond immediate challenges and envision what Arctic diplomacy could become. This was the backdrop for a panel discussion at the Arctic Circle Assembly in Reykjavík, October 2024, available as a recording above.

The event was Co-organized by Academia Europaea Bergen, and moderated by Ole Øvretveit, Manager & Researcher of the Arctic Science Diplomacy Project, University of Bergen & Academia Europaea Bergen. In the panel were Melody Brown Burkins of the Institute of Arctic Studies, Dartmouth College, Lise Øvreås, president of The Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, Volker Rachold of the German Arctic Office, Alfred Wegener-Institute (AWI), Gunn-Britt Retter, Arctic & Environmental Unit, Saami Council and Henry Burgess, Head of the NERC Arctic Office, British Antarctic Survey; President, International Arctic Science Committee (IASC).

In her introduction, Melody Brown Burkins described how the Arctic Science Diplomacy Project is a group with very diverse perspective, with several group members part of the Arctic Circle Assembly panel. Furthermore, she emphasized how this group will focus less on the immediate future of Arctic Science Diplomacy, but rather look ahead to possible scenarios in the build-up to the 5th International Polar Year 2032-2033.

In the following conversation, a range of topics relating to the future om Arctic Science Diplomacy are discussed.